Review
« Older Entries |Reviewer of the Year
Wednesday, February 24th, 2010My week started off nicely with a letter from Dianne Murray, general editor of Interacting with Computers, informing me of the publication of her formal thanks to the journal’s reviewers. What I didn’t realize was that I was named one of the journal’s Reviewers of the Year (this link opens a short PDF file). It […]
Where do you sign up for reviewing?
Thursday, June 18th, 2009I have noted before that I enjoy reviewing other people’s articles/book chapters/whatever. It’s interesting reading what other people are doing and I enjoy helping others improve their papers through feedback. Plus the whole “you have to do this for your career as a scientist” aspect of it (which doesn’t make it more enjoyable, but does […]
IHM 2008 cherche des relecteurs
Friday, March 28th, 2008Si vous avez le temps et l’expertise en IHM, offrez vos services en tant que relecteur/trice pour IHM 2008. C’est une bonne fa&ccedi;on d’ajouter des lignes à votre C.V. si vous êtes encore à l’université.
I’m too late
Monday, May 1st, 2006Ack! I completely forgot to volunteer to review papers for CSCW2006 and the review due-by date has already gone by. All the more embarassing since I’m on the organising committee.
My only excuse is that at the time I should have been putting my name down for reviews, I was gearing up for my presentation at […]
Speaking of anonymity
Tuesday, April 25th, 2006If you are submitting your review in MS Word format, make sure you’ve stripped out your personal information beforehand, or that review may not be as anonymous as you thought.
Via Improbable Research.
Anonymity and the article review process
Tuesday, April 25th, 2006Considering how easy it is to Google article titles, it seems self-defeating to keep one’s papers in the reference list and just remove the author names, when one is anonymizing an article for review.
« Older Entries |